<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Phone Street &#187; report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/tag/report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com</link>
	<description>road to wireless life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:00:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Full Samsung Continuum specs leak out in Verizon comparison charts?</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/11/03/full-samsung-continuum-specs-leak-out-in-verizon-comparison-charts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/11/03/full-samsung-continuum-specs-leak-out-in-verizon-comparison-charts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 02:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jedwan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[droids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairly-familiar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung-continuum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsungcontinuum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ticker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ How does the as-yet-unannounced Samsung Continuum stack up against Verizon's pack of Droids, not to mention its Galaxy S brethren? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/02/full-samsung-continuum-specs-leak-out-in-verizon-comparison-char/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/11-2-10-droidlifecontinuum6001.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>How does the as-yet-unannounced <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/SamsungContinuum/">Samsung Continuum</a> stack up against Verizon&#8217;s pack of Droids, not to mention its Galaxy S brethren? That&#8217;s what we&#8217;re finding out for the very first time in a set of allegedly leaked charts. Performance-wise we&#8217;re looking at a fairly familiar beast with a 1GHz Hummingbird processor, 384MB of RAM and 512MB of ROM, plus 2GB of on-board flash storage and a preloaded 8GB microSD card. Where it gets interesting is that secondary display, which measures 1.8 inches with a 96 x 480 resolution, which will indeed act as a status update, RSS feed and weather report stock ticker that you activate (even when the handset is asleep!) by gripping the bottom of the phone. You&#8217;re also getting a 5 megapixel camera with LED flash and 720p video recording, 802.11 b/g/n WiFi and 3G mobile hotspot for up to five devices, but it&#8217;s not all peaches and cream &#8212; the whole shebang uses Bing for search, and runs on Android 2.1. Here&#8217;s hoping Samsung intends to provide us a Froyo rollout date when it <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/02/samsung-continuum-turns-up-on-verizons-holiday-site/">finally announces</a> this phone. Find the full spec sheets at our source links.
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/02/full-samsung-continuum-specs-leak-out-in-verizon-comparison-char/">Full Samsung Continuum specs leak out in Verizon comparison charts?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/02/full-samsung-continuum-specs-leak-out-in-verizon-comparison-char/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a><!-- odiogo-notts-begin -->
<div id="relatedposts">
<h4>Related Blogs</h4>
<ul class="pc_pingback">
<li class="hdl" style="list-style: none">Related Blogs on <b>Full Samsung Continuum specs leak out in Verizon comparison charts?</b></li>
</ul>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/11/03/full-samsung-continuum-specs-leak-out-in-verizon-comparison-charts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone DST bug causing alarms to fail across Europe</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/11/01/iphone-dst-bug-causing-alarms-to-fail-across-europe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/11/01/iphone-dst-bug-causing-alarms-to-fail-across-europe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alarm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daylightsavingstime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe-twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[result]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ An iPhone bug already seen when Australia switched between Daylight Savings Time and Standard Time a few weeks ago has now hit Europe. Twitter is alight with reports of recurring iPhone alarms going off an hour later than usual. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> </div>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/01/iphone-dst-bug-causing-alarms-to-fail-across-europe/"><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/iphone-clock.gif" alt="" /></a>An <a href="http://www.cellmobileguide.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.cellmobileguide.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">iPhone</a> bug already seen when Australia switched between Daylight Savings Time and Standard Time a few weeks ago has now hit Europe. Twitter is alight with reports of recurring <a href="http://www.mobilephonestreet.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.mobilephonestreet.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">iPhone</a> alarms going off an hour later than usual. So even though the iOS clock changed correctly over the weekend, the alarm is still locked to Daylight Savings Time. Thing is, according to a <em>ZDNet Australia</em> report from more than three weeks ago, Apple acknowledged the bug with a promise to fix it with a software update. So why wasn&#8217;t it rolled out in time to avoid this mess in Europe? Let&#8217;s see if Apple fixes it when North America makes the switch on November 7th.</p>
<p>[Thanks, David O.]
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/01/iphone-dst-bug-causing-alarms-to-fail-across-europe/">iPhone DST bug causing alarms to fail across Europe</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 01 Nov 2010 02:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/01/iphone-dst-bug-causing-alarms-to-fail-across-europe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a><!-- odiogo-notts-begin -->
<div id="relatedposts">
<h4>Related Blogs</h4>
<ul class="pc_pingback">
<li class="hdl" style="list-style: none">Related Blogs on <b><a href="http://www.cellcallworld.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.cellcallworld.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">iPhone</a> DST bug causing alarms to fail across Europe</b></li>
</ul>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/11/01/iphone-dst-bug-causing-alarms-to-fail-across-europe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC Speedy a Knight in Sprint armor coming January 6th?</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/10/26/htc-speedy-a-knight-in-sprint-armor-coming-january-6th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/10/26/htc-speedy-a-knight-in-sprint-armor-coming-january-6th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jedwan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[armor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc speedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/10/26/htc-speedy-a-knight-in-sprint-armor-coming-january-6th/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ We were just getting used to HTC Knight when along comes more supposed details of the still-unconfirmed slider. Boy Genius Report has what it claims is a leaked accessories list from Sprint that reveals a case for the Knight is due on January 6th, 2011. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/26/htc-speedy-a-knight-in-sprint-armor-coming-january-6th/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/10-23-10-htcknight_250x344.jpg" /></a>We were just getting used to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/23/htc-knight-surfaces-for-sprint-with-android-and-a-slider-of-som/">HTC Knight</a> when along comes more supposed details of the still-unconfirmed slider. <em>Boy Genius Report</em> has what it claims is a leaked accessories list from Sprint that reveals a case for the Knight is due on January 6th, 2011. Does that mean the phone itself is launching on the same date? Would that date have something to do with the start of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CES/">CES</a>? Oh, and <em>BGR</em> also claims from a source the Knight is getting a new title. What do you think about the HTC Speedy &#8212; descriptive, eh? As far as we can tell, there isn&#8217;t really much else to go by at this point, so our jump to conclusion will just have to stay under the bed for now.
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/26/htc-speedy-a-knight-in-sprint-armor-coming-january-6th/">HTC Speedy a Knight in Sprint armor coming January 6th?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/26/htc-speedy-a-knight-in-sprint-armor-coming-january-6th/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/10/26/htc-speedy-a-knight-in-sprint-armor-coming-january-6th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: we&#8217;re keeping our mobiles longer, despite sinking prices</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/09/28/study-were-keeping-our-mobiles-longer-despite-sinking-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/09/28/study-were-keeping-our-mobiles-longer-despite-sinking-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jedwan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[after-the-break]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[existing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[length]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/09/28/study-were-keeping-our-mobiles-longer-despite-sinking-prices/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Had your current cellphone for the better part of the this century? Turns out you aren't the only one -- according to new research gathered by J.D. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/26/study-were-keeping-our-mobiles-longer-despite-sinking-prices/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/gal-holding-n97.jpg" /></a>Had your current cellphone for the better part of the this century? Turns out you aren&#8217;t the only one &#8212; according to new research gathered by J.D. Power and Associates, Americans are holding onto their mobiles for longer than ever these days. In fact, the study found that the length of time customers keep their traditional wireless <a href="http://www.cellmobileguide.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.cellmobileguide.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">cell phone</a> has increased by 17 percent from 2009, with the average customer holding onto their phone for around 20.5 months. That&#8217;s the longest period since this study began tracking the data in 1999, when the average was 17.3 months. Kirk Parsons, senior director of wireless services at the company, feels that the recent economic downturn has a lot to do with folks keeping their existing phones longer, while we&#8217;re guessing that it has to do with existing phones simply being &#8220;good enough.&#8221; </p>
<p>Furthermore, anyone who is even remotely tuned into the mobile world knows that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/verizon-talks-commercial-lte-deployment-details-data-devices-fi/">widespread 4G is just around the bend</a>, giving folks reason to hold off on renewing their contract until WiMAX / <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LTE/">LTE</a> comes to their carrier of choice. Curiously, phone prices are lower than ever before, which should mean that it&#8217;s even less expensive to upgrade now than in the past. Of course, none of that matters if your existing phone contract isn&#8217;t up (or you aren&#8217;t due for a discounted renewal), and the savings on the hardware is likely being devoured by the extra fees we&#8217;re paying for messaging and data. So, are you in the &#8220;run it till it dies&#8221; camp, or are you wondering who on Earth this survey (shown in full after the break) is referring to?
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/27/study-were-keeping-our-mobiles-longer-despite-sinking-prices/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Study: we&#8217;re keeping our mobiles longer, despite sinking prices</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/27/study-were-keeping-our-mobiles-longer-despite-sinking-prices/">Study: we&#8217;re keeping our mobiles longer, despite sinking prices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/27/study-were-keeping-our-mobiles-longer-despite-sinking-prices/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/09/28/study-were-keeping-our-mobiles-longer-despite-sinking-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlackBerry Bold R020 and 9670 Oxford flip outed?</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/08/21/blackberry-bold-r020-and-9670-oxford-flip-outed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/08/21/blackberry-bold-r020-and-9670-oxford-flip-outed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jedwan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bold r020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boldr020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[external]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-purported]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usual-amenities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/08/21/blackberry-bold-r020-and-9670-oxford-flip-outed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ It's felt almost as if the BlackBerry smartphone rumor mill has been a little too quiet -- dare we say burnt out -- since the Torch hit the scene ( BlackPad notwithstanding, of course). That's all changed with a pair of interesting leaks care of Boy Genius Report . Behold a successor to the Bold 9700 , the R020]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/blackberry-bold-r020-and-9670-oxford-flip-outed/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/bgr-bb-leaks-rm-eng.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>It&#8217;s felt almost as if the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/BlackBerry/">BlackBerry</a> smartphone rumor mill has been a little too quiet &#8212; dare we say burnt out &#8212; since the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/blackpad">Torch</a> hit the scene (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/blackpad">BlackPad</a> notwithstanding, of course). That&#8217;s all changed with a pair of interesting leaks care of <em>Boy Genius Report</em>. Behold a successor to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Bold9700/">Bold 9700</a>, the R020. The tri-band UMTS / quad-band EDGE device is gonna disappoint some with the same 624MHz clockspeed and 2.44-inch 480 x 360 screen, but it does have twice the RAM (512MB), a 5 megapixel camera with AF and flash, and of course runs on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/BlackBerry6/">BlackBerry 6</a>. If the purported leaked slides are correct, a device of such magnitude should be launching in the October timeframe. Looking to the CDMA side of things &#8212; which means likely both Verizon and Sprint &#8212; we&#8217;ve got a 9670 &#8220;Oxford&#8221; (at least by codename) flip phone with a full QWERTY keyboard, 5 megapixel camera, 360 x 400 internal display (240 x 320 for the external), usual amenities like WiFi and GPS, and the hip new BB6. No touchscreen on either phones, as far as we can tell, but perhaps that&#8217;s a blessing for those that fret smudged screens.
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/blackberry-bold-r020-and-9670-oxford-flip-outed/">BlackBerry Bold R020 and 9670 Oxford flip outed?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/blackberry-bold-r020-and-9670-oxford-flip-outed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/08/21/blackberry-bold-r020-and-9670-oxford-flip-outed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, the iPhone 4 is broken / No, the iPhone 4 is not broken</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/07/14/yes-the-iphone-4-is-broken-no-the-iphone-4-is-not-broken/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/07/14/yes-the-iphone-4-is-broken-no-the-iphone-4-is-not-broken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jedwan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antenna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antenna-issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outcry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[using-the-phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[well-as-reached]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[york]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The controversy over the iPhone 4's antenna issues continues to grow, particularly after Consumer Reports confirmed yesterday that every iPhone 4 suffers from signal attenuation when the phone is held with the lower left corner covered -- a report that we confirmed with results from our own custom signal metering app. At this point, there's no longer any question in our minds that the iPhone 4's antenna can be made to lose signal by holding it "wrong" -- and we definitely think it's more than a little silly that simply holding the phone in your left hand has been nicknamed the "death grip." That said, however, it's not at all clear what the real-world effects of the antenna issue actually are for most people -- as we've repeatedly said, several iPhone 4s owned by the Engadget staff (including our review unit) have never experienced so much as a single dropped call, while others suffer from signal issues that results in lost calls and unresponsive data in a dramatic way. What's more, at this point Apple's sold well over two million iPhone 4s , and we simply haven't heard the sort of outcry from users that we'd normally hear if a product this high-profile and this popular had a showstopping defect. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/13/yes-the-iphone-4-is-broken-no-the-iphone-4-is-not-broken/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/2010-07-12iphonerecp-1.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p><span></span> The controversy over the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/30/iphone-4s-antenna-problem-looks-worse-than-it-is-but-its-stil/">iPhone 4&#8242;s antenna issues</a> continues to grow, particularly after <em>Consumer Reports</em> confirmed yesterday that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/consumer-reports-confirms-iphone-4-antenna-problems-and-so-do/">every iPhone 4 suffers from signal attenuation</a> when the phone is held with the lower left corner covered &#8212; a report that we confirmed with results from our own custom signal metering app. At this point, there&#8217;s no longer any question in our minds that the <a href="http://www.cellsmartphone.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.cellsmartphone.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">iPhone</a> 4&#8242;s antenna can be made to lose signal by holding it &#8220;wrong&#8221; &#8212; and we definitely think it&#8217;s more than a little silly that simply holding the phone in your left hand has been nicknamed the &#8220;death grip.&#8221;</p>
<p>That said, however, it&#8217;s not at all clear what the real-world effects of the antenna issue <em>actually are</em> for most people &#8212; as we&#8217;ve repeatedly said, several <a href="http://www.mobilewirelessphone.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.mobilewirelessphone.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">iPhone</a> 4s owned by the Engadget staff (including our review unit) have never experienced so much as a single dropped <a href="http://www.supercardsusa.com/" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.supercardsusa.com/';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">call</a>, while others suffer from signal issues that results in lost <a href="http://www.phonelicensing.info/" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.phonelicensing.info/';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">calls</a> and unresponsive data in a dramatic way. What&#8217;s more, at this point Apple&#8217;s sold <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/apple-sells-1-7-million-iphone-4s-through-satruday-june-26/">well over two million iPhone 4s</a>, and we simply haven&#8217;t heard the sort of outcry from users that we&#8217;d normally hear if a product this high-profile and this popular had a showstopping defect. Honestly, it&#8217;s puzzling &#8212; we know that the phone has an antenna-related problem, but we&#8217;re simply not able to say what that issue actually means for everyday users.</p>
<p>So we&#8217;re doing what we <em>can</em> do: we&#8217;ve collected reports from every member of the Engadget staff who&#8217;s using the phone, as well as reached out to a variety of tech industry colleagues for their experiences. As you&#8217;ll see, it seems like most of our peers seem to be doing perfectly fine with their iPhone 4s, but the people who are having problems are having maddening issues in an inconsistent way. We&#8217;d say it all comes down to the network &#8212; particularly in New York City, where AT&#038;T just <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/">completed a major upgrade</a> &#8212; but even that isn&#8217;t a consistent factor in predicting experience. Ultimately, we just won&#8217;t know what&#8217;s really going on until Apple comes clean and addresses this issue (and the growing PR nightmare it&#8217;s become), but for now we can say with some certainty that not everyone is affected, and those that are seem to be in the minority. Read on for the full report.
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/13/yes-the-iphone-4-is-broken-no-the-iphone-4-is-not-broken/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yes, the iPhone 4 is broken / No, the iPhone 4 is not broken</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/13/yes-the-iphone-4-is-broken-no-the-iphone-4-is-not-broken/">Yes, the iPhone 4 is broken / No, the iPhone 4 is not broken</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/13/yes-the-iphone-4-is-broken-no-the-iphone-4-is-not-broken/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a><!-- odiogo-notts-begin -->
<div id="relatedposts">
<h4>Related Blogs</h4>
<ul class="pc_pingback">
<li class="hdl" style="list-style: none">Related Blogs on <b>Yes, the iPhone 4 is broken / No, the iPhone 4 is not broken</b></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bitterwallet.com/groupola-manhunt-fails-but-proof-of-iphone-4-buyers-revealed/31994">Groupola manhunt fails, but proof of <b>iPhone 4</b> buyers revealed <b>&#8230;</b></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/07/14/yes-the-iphone-4-is-broken-no-the-iphone-4-is-not-broken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple #1 US phone manufacturer, RIM enters top 5 worldwide, Motorola feels the burn</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/04/30/apple-1-us-phone-manufacturer-rim-enters-top-5-worldwide-motorola-feels-the-burn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/04/30/apple-1-us-phone-manufacturer-rim-enters-top-5-worldwide-motorola-feels-the-burn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jedwan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feels-the-burn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/04/30/apple-1-us-phone-manufacturer-rim-enters-top-5-worldwide-motorola-feels-the-burn/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Apple, love it or lump it, has seen some big numbers lately: one million App Store apps downloaded, ten billion iTunes, and now it looks like the company can claim to be the number one phone maker in the US. According to Forbes , Apple sold 8.8 million iPhones in the first quarter, as opposed to 8.5 million mobile devices sold by Motorola -- quite a slide when you figure that four years ago the company moved something like 46.1 million in Q1. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/1004030-applemoto-01.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<div>Apple, love it or lump it, has seen some big numbers lately: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/engadget-app-update-iphone-app-passes-the-1m-download-mark-and/">one million</a> App Store apps downloaded, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/apple-serves-up-10-billionth-itune-smiles-all-the-way-to-the-ba/">ten billion</a> iTunes, and now it looks like the company can claim to be the number one phone maker in the US. According to <em>Forbes</em>, Apple sold 8.8 million iPhones in the first quarter, as opposed to 8.5 million mobile devices sold by Motorola &#8212; quite a slide when you figure that four years ago the company moved something like 46.1 million in Q1. If that ain&#8217;t enough to give Motorola pause, industry analysts IDC have issued a report stating that, while the <a href="http://www.mobilewirelessphone.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.mobilewirelessphone.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">mobile phone</a> industry continues to recover (growing almost 22 percent in Q1) Motorola has been knocked out of the top five worldwide mobile vendors by RIM. We guess the next question is, will <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/motorola,android">Motorola&#8217;s all-Android, all-the-time strategy</a> be enough to bring it back into the big leagues?</div>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/30/apple-1-us-phone-manufacturer-rim-enters-top-5-worldwide-moto/">Apple #1 US phone manufacturer, RIM enters top 5 worldwide, Motorola feels the burn</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/30/apple-1-us-phone-manufacturer-rim-enters-top-5-worldwide-moto/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/04/30/apple-1-us-phone-manufacturer-rim-enters-top-5-worldwide-motorola-feels-the-burn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ: Apple &#8216;developing new iPhone,&#8217; plus another for Verizon (update: iPhone HD?)</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/03/30/wsj-apple-developing-new-iphone-plus-another-for-verizon-update-iphone-hd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/03/30/wsj-apple-developing-new-iphone-plus-another-for-verizon-update-iphone-hd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jedwan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cdma iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cupertino-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hon hai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon-iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wallstreetjournal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/03/30/wsj-apple-developing-new-iphone-plus-another-for-verizon-update-iphone-hd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ You heard right, folks -- according to the Wall Street Journal, Apple is currently "developing a new iPhone to debut this summer," and as if that weren't enough, it's also "working on another model for US mobile phone operator Verizon Wireless." As of this moment, details about the break are nowhere to be found, but it's not like either tidbit is shocking. This summer will mark the one-year anniversary of the iPhone 3GS , and if the Cupertino-based company keeps with its historical refresh pattern , we're just a few months out from seeing the latest and greatest iPhone. There's also been no shortage of iPhone-to-Verizon rumors over the years, with the latest of 'em happening during the run-up to the iPad's launch]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304370304575152242601774892.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLETopStories"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/iphone-back.png" /></a></div>
<p><span></span>You heard right, folks &#8212; according to the <i>Wall Street Journal,</i> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Apple/">Apple</a> is currently &#8220;developing a new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPhone/">iPhone</a> to debut this summer,&#8221; and as if that weren&#8217;t enough, it&#8217;s also &#8220;working on another model for US <a href="http://www.cellsmartphone.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.cellsmartphone.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">mobile phone</a> operator Verizon Wireless.&#8221; As of this moment, details about the break are nowhere to be found, but it&#8217;s not like either tidbit is shocking. This summer will mark the one-year anniversary of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/17/iphone-3g-s-review">iPhone 3GS</a>, and if the Cupertino-based company keeps with its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/iphone-3g-review/">historical refresh pattern</a>, we&#8217;re just a few months out from seeing the latest and greatest <a href="http://www.prointelecto.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.prointelecto.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">iPhone</a>. There&#8217;s also been no shortage of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/verizon,iphone">iPhone-to-Verizon rumors</a> over the years, with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/apple-rumor-roundup-the-day-before-edition/">latest</a> of &#8216;em happening during the run-up to the iPad&#8217;s launch.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: We&#8217;re now learning that the &#8220;next <a href="http://www.cellwirelessphone.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.cellwirelessphone.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">iPhone</a> is being manufactured by Taiwanese contract manufacturer Hon Hai Precision Industry,&#8221; which just so happens to be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/hon-hai-cops-to-iphone-contract/">the same outfit</a> responsible for crafting all prior iPhones. That&#8217;s according to &#8220;people briefed on the matter&#8221; and sourced by the <em>WSJ</em>. It&#8217;s also stated that the world&#8217;s first CDMA <a href="http://www.cellcallworld.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.cellcallworld.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">iPhone</a> will be manufactured by Pegatron Technology, which we caught just last week <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/pegatron-showing-off-miniature-tegra-2-powered-home-theater-pc/">dabbling</a> in some of NVIDIA&#8217;s Tegra 2-based wares. If all goes well, Pegatron could begin mass production of the CDMA iPhone (exact model not disclosed) this September, so it&#8217;s hard to say if Sprint or Verizon would have access before the all-too-lucrative holiday season. As for quotes on the matter? Most everyone involved wouldn&#8217;t say a word, but an AT&#038;T spokesman did utter the following: &#8220;<em>There has been lots of incorrect speculation on CDMA iPhones for a long time. We haven&#8217;t seen one yet and only Apple knows when that might occur.</em>&#8220;</p>
<p>On a week that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/12/ipad-pre-order-is-go-will-you-buy-one/">couldn&#8217;t possibly get any bigger</a> for Apple, that&#8217;s exactly what just happened. Everyone suspected that a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/is-this-the-face-of-the-iphone-4g/">fourth-generation iPhone</a> was in the works, but having an outlet like the <em>WSJ</em> confirm it just makes the summer that much harder to wait for. There&#8217;s also the possibility that 2010 will be the final year that AT&#038;T retains its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/23/atandt-mobility-ceo-suggests-iphone-exclusivity-will-end-someti/">death-grip</a> on the iPhone, but by the sound of this report, it still seems as if the nation&#8217;s largest GSM carrier may nab exclusive rights on the <em>latest</em> iPhone. We also can&#8217;t help but wonder about the future of a true 4G iPhone &#8212; will Sprint manage to grab a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/21/new-sprint-ad-shows-iphone-using-wimax-via-overdrive/">WiMAX-enabled version</a>? Will Verizon get its grubby paws on an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/apple-job-posting-hints-lte-powering-a-future-iphone/">LTE model</a>? We figured only Jobs would know, but now&#8230; there might just be someone else out there willing to spill the beans.</p>
<p><strong>Update 2</strong>: Soon after the news broke, we were informed that the next-generation iPhone would be announced on June 22nd (a Tuesday, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/17/live-from-apples-iphone-os-3-0-preview-event/">naturally</a>) and would be dubbed the iPhone HD (a name that has been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/09/last-minute-apple-rumor-roundup-iphone-hd-video-out-no-new-ipo/">tossed around</a> before). That certainly makes sense given that Apple almost certainly has to up the pixel count in order to rival the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/htc-evo-4g-is-sprints-android-powered-knight-in-superphone-armo/">EVO 4G</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/25/htc-hd2-review/">HD2</a> and all of those other high-res handsets, but we&#8217;re still reserving judgment until we see that fateful media invite hit our inbox.</p>
<p>[Thanks, Chris]
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/wsj-apple-developing-new-iphone-plus-another-for-verizon/">WSJ: Apple &#8216;developing new iPhone,&#8217; plus another for Verizon (update: iPhone HD?)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/29/wsj-apple-developing-new-iphone-plus-another-for-verizon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/03/30/wsj-apple-developing-new-iphone-plus-another-for-verizon-update-iphone-hd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Select SF-area iPhones insist they&#8217;re in Boulder, Colorado</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/03/22/select-sf-area-iphones-insist-theyre-in-boulder-colorado/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/03/22/select-sf-area-iphones-insist-theyre-in-boulder-colorado/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jedwan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erroneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone3gs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphonegps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iteration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software-linked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/03/22/select-sf-area-iphones-insist-theyre-in-boulder-colorado/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The iPhone's iteration of Google Maps has been shown up time and time again by Google Maps Navigation on Android, but a quirk this big just has to be linked to some Skyhook database issue. According to a new report coming from NorCal, select iPhone users in southern San Francisco are seeing their GPS software linked to Boulder, Colorado, and the issue has been going on for around a week now. What's curious is that the erroneous positioning affects other third-party iPhone GPS apps as well, and an ABC report notes that a "spokesperson at AT&#038;T said the problem is with Apple." Pass the blame much, AT&#038;T]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_14703981?source=rss_viewed"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/sf-hard-rock-co-iphone-gps.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>The <a href="http://www.cellcallworld.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.cellcallworld.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">iPhone</a>&#8216;s iteration of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/26/iphone-software-2-2-features-google-street-view-mass-transit-di/">Google Maps</a> has been shown up time and time again by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/28/google-navigation-video-hands-on-you-want-this/">Google Maps Navigation</a> on Android, but a quirk this big just has to be linked to some Skyhook database issue. According to a new report coming from NorCal, select <a href="http://www.prointelecto.com" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.prointelecto.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">iPhone</a> users in southern San Francisco are seeing their GPS software linked to Boulder, Colorado, and the issue has been going on for around a week now. What&#8217;s curious is that the erroneous positioning affects other third-party <a href="http://www.mobilephoneman.com/" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.mobilephoneman.com/';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">iPhone</a> GPS apps as well, and an <i>ABC</i> report notes that a &#8220;spokesperson at AT&#038;T said the problem is with Apple.&#8221; Pass the blame much, AT&#038;T? So, have any of you SF-based iPhoners found yourself navigating to Folsom Stadium when trying to find your way to SoMa? </p>
<p>[Thanks, Charles]
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/21/select-sf-area-iphones-insist-theyre-in-boulder-colorado/">Select SF-area iPhones insist they&#8217;re in Boulder, Colorado</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/21/select-sf-area-iphones-insist-theyre-in-boulder-colorado/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/03/22/select-sf-area-iphones-insist-theyre-in-boulder-colorado/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palm posts $22m Q3 loss, says it liked its chances against Droid had Verizon launch been sooner</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/03/19/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-says-it-liked-its-chances-against-droid-had-verizon-launch-been-sooner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/03/19/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-says-it-liked-its-chances-against-droid-had-verizon-launch-been-sooner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jedwan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fortnight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarterly earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[result]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/03/19/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-says-it-liked-its-chances-against-droid-had-verizon-launch-been-sooner/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Palm gave us a heads-up back in late February that its upcoming earnings report wouldn't exactly be cause for celebration, and today the news has become official: the outfit recorded a net loss of $22 million during its fiscal Q3, which still looks rosy compared to the $98 million loss it suffered this quarter a year ago. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://investor.palm.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=453337"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/palm-lobby-headquarters.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>Palm gave us <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/25/palm-sales-lower-than-expected-revenues-to-miss-targets/">a heads-up</a> back in late February that its upcoming earnings report wouldn&#8217;t exactly be cause for celebration, and today the news has become official: the outfit recorded a net loss of $22 million during its fiscal Q3, which still looks rosy compared to the $98 million loss it suffered this quarter a year ago. All told, the firm shipped 960,000 smartphones in the period, which represents a 23 percent uptick from Q2 2010 and a nearly 300 percent increase compared to this quarter in 2009. Unfortunately, sell-through wasn&#8217;t exactly stellar, with just 408,000 units changing hands &#8212; that&#8217;s a 29 percent decline from last quarter and a 15 percent drop year-over-year. We get the impression that it&#8217;s waiting for carriers to get down to replenishment levels, but it&#8217;s hard to say when that&#8217;ll happen. Jon Rubinstein, Palm&#8217;s chairman and CEO, was obviously not thrilled about the news, but he&#8217;s mirroring <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/25/palm-boss-rubenstein-sends-letter-to-employees-talks-turnaround/">statements made to employees</a> just over a fortnight ago with this quote: </p>
<blockquote>
<div><em>&#8220;Our recent underperformance has been very disappointing, but the potential for Palm remains strong. The work we&#8217;re doing to improve sales is having an impact, we&#8217;re making great progress on future products, and we&#8217;re looking forward to upcoming launches with new carrier partners. Most importantly, we have built a unique and highly differentiated platform in webOS, which will provide us with a considerable &#8211; and growing &#8211; advantage as we move forward.&#8221; </em></div>
</blockquote>
<p>We&#8217;re listening into the earnings <a href="http://www.longdistancedial.com/" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.longdistancedial.com/';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">call</a> right now, and so far we&#8217;ve heard a few choice quotes. Jon mentioned that Palm has &#8220;aggressive roadmaps on the software front that we&#8217;re working on,&#8221; and that there were &#8220;no changes to our planned carrier launches.&#8221; We&#8217;ll let you know if he introduces the Pixi 2 or anything.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> The <a href="http://www.callingcardscity.com/" style=""   onmouseover="self.status='http://www.callingcardscity.com/';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">call</a>&#8216;s over. <em>PreCentral</em> <a href="http://www.precentral.net/palm-ceo-pre-would-have-done-better-droid-if-it-launched-first-4th-quarter-be-grim">points out</a> a choice quote from Rubinstein:<br />
<blockquote>
<div>We had an arrangement with Sprint that when we launched with Sprint that they would invest in marketing and carry the product and for that they would get an exclusive for a period of time. That really determined when we could do our launch at Verizon. I agree with your premise that if we could have launched at Verizon earlier, prior to Droid, that we would have gotten the attention that the Droid got and since I believe that we have a better product, I think we would have even done better.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>In other words, Palm &#8212; regardless of Verizon&#8217;s positioning &#8212; feels like the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/PrePlus/">Pre Plus</a> could&#8217;ve been a legitimate contender as a halo phone for the carrier had it been able to launch sooner, though that opportunity has obviously long since passed. We&#8217;re not so sure we agree that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Droid/">Droid</a> and the Pre Plus play in quite the same space, but if nothing else, we like the chutzpah &#8212; now it&#8217;s time to deliver some new hardware.
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-making-great-progress-on-future-produc/">Palm posts $22m Q3 loss, says it liked its chances against Droid had Verizon launch been sooner</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-making-great-progress-on-future-produc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilephonestreet.com/2010/03/19/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-says-it-liked-its-chances-against-droid-had-verizon-launch-been-sooner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

